De-Indianising Tech Firms: US Pollster’s H-1B Visa Controversy

Iran’s recent presidential election has resulted in a runoff after no candidate secured more than 50% of the vote in the first round. The two leading candidates are reformist-backed Masoud Pezeshkian and hardline conservative Saeed Jalili. This rare runoff marks growing political diversity in the country’s elections, reflecting a shift in public sentiment amidst economic uncertainties and international tensions.

Masoud Pezeshkian, a heart surgeon and lawmaker, has consistently supported moderate reforms and closer ties with the West. In contrast, Jalili, a former nuclear negotiator, is known for his strict conservative views and opposition to restoring the 2015 nuclear deal.

This election was called after the death of president Ebrahim Raisi in a helicopter crash. The first round of voting saw low turnout, signaling voter fatigue and declining faith in the political process. Authorities hope that the second round will establish greater legitimacy through increased participation.

The outcome of the runoff may significantly impact Iran’s foreign policy, domestic reforms, and the country’s role in ongoing regional conflicts. Voter choices between a moderate and a hardliner could shape Iran’s direction in dealing with Western sanctions and regional diplomacy.

Iran election, presidential runoff, Masoud Pezeshkian, Saeed Jalili, Iranian politics