U.S. and India Clash on Boeing 787 Crash Investigation

Tensions have reportedly arisen between American and Indian investigators over the crash of an Air India Boeing 787 earlier this year. Disagreements emerged regarding where to analyze the aircraft’s flight recorders and the pace and method of data examination, causing delays in the joint investigation.

The U.S. National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) and India’s Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB) disagreed on analyzing evidence. While Indian authorities proposed examining the recorders in Korwa, northern India, the Americans preferred New Delhi or Washington, D.C., citing safety concerns. NTSB Chair Jennifer Homendy reportedly blocked the Korwa plan and threatened to end U.S. participation unless New Delhi or Washington was chosen. India eventually agreed to New Delhi.

Tensions also surrounded the process of investigation. Indian examiners preferred a sequential approach, whereas U.S. officials wanted a faster, broader review to identify any potential design flaws in the 787. Delays in providing flight recorder data frustrated U.S. agencies.

Cultural and national pride played a role, with Indian investigators expressing confidence in their capabilities. AAIB chief G.V.G. Yugandhar reportedly emphasized India’s ability to lead the investigation independently.

The crash of Flight 171 occurred shortly after takeoff from Ahmedabad, killing 260 people. Preliminary findings revealed that fuel control switches had been moved to the “CUTOFF” position, reducing engine thrust. U.S. officials suspect the senior pilot may have intentionally caused the crash, a theory not publicly addressed by Indian authorities or unions. Data also indicates the first officer panicked and attempted to regain control as the plane descended.

Air India 787, crash investigation, NTSB, AAIB, flight recorders